From the column: The Dean 25

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 05/30 at 11:11 PM (0) Comments

I had planned this morning to tell you all about DNC Chairman Howard Dean’s 25 appointments to the party’s Credentials Committee. Depending on how the DNC’s Rules & Bylaws Committee meeting goes today and whether superdelegates begin declaring en masse following the last primaries of the season on Tuesday, the Credentials Committee could become the grandest stage of all on the path to the Democratic presidential nomination.

But I think I’m going to stash that list for the time being and focus instead this morning on the membership of the Rules & Bylaws Committee, which will today hear arguments about and decide what to do with delegates from Michigan and Florida. Since that’s where all the attention is going to be for the next several hours, let’s look at who will have the final say tomorrow afternoon.

Information for this list is provided by TalkLeft.com, DemConWatch.com and The Huffington Post. I’ve listed the members alphabetically with their home state and candidate affiliation, if known. If I’ve had anything to add in the way of potentially helpful anecdotes, I’ve included it at the end of each member’s entry.

I struggled with the designation for those who have not yet publicly affiliated with either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. I decided to go with “undeclared” rather than “unknown,“ since I believe there are very few, if any, Democratic delegates out there who are truly undecided about whom to support.

So here’s the list:

  • Committee Co-Chairwoman Alexis Herman (Washington, D.C.); no affiliation. Served as Secretary of Labor during President Clinton’s second term.

  • Committee Co-Chairman James Roosevelt, Jr. (Massachusetts); no affiliation.

  • Donna Brazile (D.C.); undeclared. The most well-known of the bunch, Brazile advised Bill Clinton’s 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns. President Clinton made her a superdelegate.

  • Mark Brewer (Mich.); undeclared. Chairman of Michigan State Democratic Party.

  • Martha Fuller Clark (N.H.) Obama.

  • Ralph Dawson (N.Y.); undeclared. One of the few undeclared superdelegates from Clinton’s home state. Introduced the resolution to strip Florida of its delegates for breaking from the DNC-approved primary calendar.

  • Hartina Flournay (D.C.); Clinton.

  • Carol Khare Fowler (S.C.); Obama. Is married to fellow RBC member Donald Fowler.

  • Donald Fowler (S.C.); Clinton. Is married to fellow RBC member Carol Fowler.

  • Yvonne Gates (Nev.); undeclared. Is rumored to support Obama. Former chairwoman of DNC Black Caucus.

  • Alice Germond (D.C.); undeclared. A former officer of the California State Democratic Party, she also serves as DNC secretary. Was political director for Clinton/Gore 1992.

  • Jaime Gonzalez, Jr. (Texas); Clinton.

  • Janice Griffin (Md.); Obama.

  • Alice Huffman (Calif.);Clinton.

  • Thomas Hynes (Ill.);Obama.

  • Harold Ickes, Jr. (D.C.); Clinton. Formerly Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton; chief campaign strategist for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign and one of chief strategists for presidential campaign.Touted and voted for the plan to strip Florida and Michigan of delegates, which he now opposes.

  • Ben Johnson (D.C.); Clinton.

  • Elaine Kamarck (Mass.); Clinton.

  • Allan Katz (Fla.); Obama.

  • Eric Kleinfeld (D.C.); Clinton.

  • David McDonald (Wash.); undeclared. Was the first RBC member to cross-examine Florida before stripping the state of its delegates; also initiated motion to strip Michigan of its delegates. Has said he wouldn’t respond well if Clinton wanted to seat delegates based on the contests that already took place in the two states.

  • Mona Pasquil (Calif.); Clinton.

  • Mame Reiley (Va.); Clinton.

  • Jerome Wiley Segovia (Va.); undeclared. Is rumored to support Clinton. As an at-large delegate, says he represents the DNC as a whole, particularly the Latino voters that he has dedicated himself to organizing and representing.

  • Garry Shay (Calif.); Clinton.

  • Elizabeth Smith (D.C.); Clinton.

  • Michael Steed (Md.); Clinton.

  • Sharon Stroschein (S.D.); Obama.

  • Sarah Swisher (Iowa); Obama.

  • Everett Ward (N.C.); Obama.

    That gives us 13 declared Clinton supporters, eight declared Obama supporters and seven undeclared members.

    You may notice that there is one delegate from each embattled state: Michigan’s Mark Brewer is undeclared, while Florida’s Allen Katz is an Obama supporter. DNC rules prohibit RBC members from voting “on a challenge arising in his or her own state,“ so Brewer and Katz may end up recusing themselves. But it may turn out that both are allowed participate, since each can vote on the dispensation of the other’s delegates.

    According to the meeting’s agenda, the morning session will feature arguments of up to 15 minutes from the campaigns, state party chairs and “each challenger;“ that’s at least 90 minutes of arguments. A lunch break will follow. Members will then “consider and debate the challenges” in the afternoon session. When it comes time to vote on the sanctions/penalties/distributions/apportionments/color of the next M&M, majority rules.

    And yes, it is a 30-member committee ... I know what you’re getting at. I didn’t see any provision made for what happens in the event of a tie vote.

    CNN reported tonight that all 500 public tickets for the meeting were snapped up a matter of minutes. Should be fun!

    If you are interested in a little refresher about why the DNC was so upset about Michigan and Florida stepping out of their places in the presidential primary line, click here to read about the DNC’s Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling. It seems the 2008 calendar had its roots in a 2004 DNC resolution; the commission began meeting in March 2005.


  • Creepy, creepy, creepy

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 05/30 at 09:19 PM (0) Comments

    (I apologize in advance for linking to anything from TMZ.com. I promise that I will do my best to avoid it in the future.)

    You know that anytime you have to use the words “Clay Aiken” and “artificial insemination” in the same sentence, something seriously creepy is afoot. But here goes:

    Clay Aiken has reportedly impregnated someone via artificial imsemination.

    You may think that’s creepy enough as it is, if you’re not a fan of the American Idol Season 2 runner-up. But that’s not even the creepiest part.

    The mother is Aiken’s best friend, Jaymes Foster, who has produced several of Aiken’s records. Aiken stays with Foster when he’s in L.A.

    Can you imagine what that conversation must have been like?

    Ew.

    Foster is 50.

    Aiken is 29.

    I know that doesn’t matter when it comes to artificial insemination, but I mention it because, as TMZ.com so delicately puts it, “Clay is a lot more than sperm.“

    That’s TMZ-speak for, Aiken will have an active role in raising the child, who is due in August.

    Can I just point out right now that this is why I don’t understand why people think my preoccupation with politics is disturbing—especially when they have a preoccupation with things like this?

    Clay Aiken is having a child with his best friend and record producer, who is 21 years his senior.

    Ew.

    Creepy.


    McClellan’s motivation?

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 05/30 at 09:34 AM (0) Comments

    If you read my Wednesday post about Scott McClellan, you know I’m no fan of his—or his book.

    White House officials have met news of McClellan’s charges in his book with surprise and measured scorn. From USA Today:

    Ari Fleischer, McClellan’s predecessor at the podium, called the book “a wholesale jumping ship.“

    Current press secretary Dana Perino said of McClellan’s transformation, “It is sad. This is not the Scott we knew.“

    “I’m just flabbergasted,“ Trent Duffy, one of McClellan’s former subordinates. “Scott never hinted, whispered, breathed any shred of this when we worked together 2½ years.“

    For his part, Bush himself is said to be “puzzled, and he doesn’t recognize this as the Scott McClellan that he hired and confided in and worked with for so many years.“

    But none of that is stopping Bush haters everywhere—including in the popular press—from accepting McClellan’s allegations as Gospel truth. Conservative commentator Rich Galen put it this way:

    “When he stood behind that podium, nobody believed a word he said. Now that he’s saying bad things about the president, he’s a Delphic oracle.“

    But why the curious, some might even say inexplicable, change of heart from one who was a Texas transplant, one of the original true Bush believers?

    Whitney Peeling is the publicity director for McClellan’s publisher. Maybe we have a clue in her breezy brush-off of questions about the book’s six-week delay in hitting the streets.

    It “just needed a bit more time,“ she said.

    Fleischer talked with McClellan on Tuesday, ahead of the start of McClellan’s publicity tour. Perhaps Fleischer provided us with another clue when he said McClellan’s book used “the language of the other side in a very harsh, accusatory manner.“ In addition, according to USA Today, “Fleischer implied that McClellan’s book became more critical during the editing process. ‘The book changed a lot from the way Scott first described it to me,‘ he said.“

    And McClellan “was sheepish,“ Fleischer said. “He was starting to worry that he had crossed the Rubicon, and how bad he was going to feel.“

    Why, then, the “critical tone” that USA Today even called “striking?“

    Is it “a money-grubbing act of betrayal?“ the newspaper wondered.

    Appearing on the Today show yesterday, McClellan dodged a question that might have provided the answer.

    Asked why he’s releasing the book now, McClellan stuck to what he says is “the larger message [that] has been sort of lost in the mix,“ what he called “the permanent campaign culture in Washington, D.C.“

    “My hope is that in some small way it might help us from the destructive, partisan warfare from the past 15 years,“ McClellan said.

    (Warning: Sarcasm ahead.)

    McClellan, completely ignoring the posed question and robotically regurgitating a stale sound bite? That’s not like him at ALL!!!

    (End sarcasm)

    Whatever his true motivation, whether his conscience or a deflated bank account, McClellan’s final product is pleasing, at least, to his publisher.

    “Lots in the works!“ Peeling squealed about the publicity tour, which includes a sit-down with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room” at 5 p.m. CST today.

    I still say it’s impossible to believe someone who is trying to convince you now that he had lied to you before. Even if he’s telling the truth now (and there’s no way to be sure he is), he’s lost every shred of credibility, so in the end, his “revelation” doesn’t matter, anyway.

    Such is the fate of Scott McClellan.

    I hope his book was worth it.


    Page 1 of 1 pages

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles