Clinton dodges Palin

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 09/18 at 10:10 PM (0) Comments

Did you hear about Hillary Clinton cancelling an appearance at a New York rally because she learned that Sarah Palin would be there?

It happened.

Clinton had committed to attending a rally organized by a handful of Jewish groups and set for Monday to protest the attendance of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the opening of the UN General Assembly.

But then, from ABC News:

Clinton aides were described as “furious” after learning from reporters—not rally organizers—of the plan to have Clinton and Palin appear together.

“Her attendance was news to us, and this was never billed to us as a partisan political event,“ said Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines in a statement to reporters. “Senator Clinton will therefore not be attending.“

Right. But here’s the thing, Phillippe: What is partisan about a rally that features leaders from both political parties?

Isn’t a partisan event, by definition, only partisan when it involves one party?

So the event was never a “partisan political event.“  If it turned into one, it was only because Clinton made it so by dropping out.

Whatever her reason, Clinton opened the door for the McCain-Palin camp to unload on her, and they were happy to do so:

Palin spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt released a statement on Clinton’s canceled appearance saying, “Governor Palin believes that the danger of a nuclear Iran is greater than party or politics. She hopes that all parties can rally together in opposition to this grave threat.“

Hmmph. Well, that smarts, but it isn’t as bad as what would have happened it Clinton had gone.

That’s because the bottom line is that Clinton cannot, under any circumstances, be photographed with Sarah Palin.

After the incredibly divisive primary the Democrats endured adn the hurt feelings the Obama campaign is desperately trying to mend in the name of party unity, can you imagine the impact a picture of Clinton and Palin together would have—especially considering that Palin has been actively courting disaffected female Clinton supporters almost nonstop since her emergence onto the national stage just three weeks ago?

A visual image like that—Clinton and Palin together—would have a devastating effect, even if only psychological, on the credibility of Clinton’s endorsement of Obama. It would suggest that Clinton was amenable, if not enthusiastic, about the idea of Palin picking up the gender mantle and working to break that “highest, hardest glass ceiling” of the White House ...

... Even though she isn’t.

Clinton was in a no-win situation here. She couldn’t go, for reasons that I have just outlined. But she will likely pay a price for staying away, too. Consider what a guy who calls himself “Fella from Chicago” had to say about this over on CNN’s Political Ticker:

Bad move Hillary. If you believe the event would be interpreted as political, then it would have at least come across as bipartisan. Better pray that Sarah doesn’t attend or the Dems have lost the Jewish vote. How many retired Jews from New York and New Jersey live in Florida?

The answer is ... a bunch.

And they vote.

Luckily for Obama, organizers have disinvited Palin from the rally on Monday:

“In order to keep the focus on Iranian threats and to ensure that this critical message not be obscured, the organizers of the rally have decided not to have any American political personalities appear,” the organizers, which include several Jewish groups, said in a statement.

You know, I just don’t get it ... Did these groups really think that neither Clinton nor Palin would draw any attention to the rally? If not, then why did they invite them in the first place?

And don’t they think they would get more attention to the rally if one appeared than if neither appeared?

Think about it: Would you be reading about this rally if Clinton and Palin hadn’t been invited—then uninvited?

Yeah ... not so much.

So, after getting a lot of publicity for their rally five days ahead of time, the organizers will now host neither candidate on Monday.

And you’re not likely to hear another word about them—or their event.


Josh Howard insults the National Anthem

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 09/18 at 08:27 AM (0) Comments

Oh, don’t worry ... he has a reason.

A video surfaced this week of the Dallas Mavericks’ Josh Howard disrespecting the National Anthem during a flag football game in July. According to the Dallas Morning News, various participants are shown mugging for the camera while the Star Spangled Banner was being played. The camera panned to Howard, who said, “‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ is going on. I don’t celebrate this [expletive]. I’m black.“

(See for yourself here, but know that the clip contains offensive language.)

Apparently, Howard believes that being black and being an American are incompatible with each other.

Of course, there is no excuse for Howard’s actions; the only explanation is that he is either unpatriotic or just plain stupid—or maybe both.

Howard’s agent, Mark Schwartz, knows it; the News reports that he did not return reporters’ phone messages.

But that didn’t stop wacko Mavericks owner Mark Cuban from coming to Howard’s defense.

Cuban told the News:

Owner Mark Cuban said the Mavericks dealt with Howard’s flag football episode after it happened in July.

“That said, we will be going through some advanced communication-skill sessions together this training camp,“ Cuban said Tuesday. “I have explained to him that cellphone cameras are not your friend and that what you think you said on camera is never what people will hear when it shows up on YouTube or TV.

“There is only one universal response that works: ‘Both teams played hard.‘“

This is not the first time Howard has been cast in an un-American light. He rejected an offer to join the U.S. Olympic team when he said the initial training camp in 2006 conflicted with his summer camps ...

“Josh really is a good guy with a great heart,“ Cuban said. “He just doesn’t do a good job of showing that side of himself publicly. We will work on that.“

Oh, yeah: Good guy. Great heart.

Not surprisingly, there’s no mention of how the Mavericks “dealt with Howard’s flag football episode.“

But notice that Cuban didn’t say that Howard needed a refresher course on respect for the flag. Cuban blamed “cellphone cameras,“ not Howard, for the incident.

And notice that Cuban never addressed the nature of the incident: He treated it like it was a mistake a rookie would make, like trash-talking another team or insulting a fan.

It appears that Cuban needs to be sitting next to Howard when Howard undergoes those “advanced communications-skills sessions.“

This is, no doubt, why Cuban later had no comment for Sports Illustrated on this issue.

“Advanced communications-skills sessions.“ Pffft. What a waste of time.

Cuban and Howard both would benefit much more from a crash course in Responsibilities of American Citizenship 101, with a heavy emphasis on the experience of war veterans.

I know of plenty of men and women who would be more than happy to school the pair in proper National Anthem etiquette—and why it’s the least that ungrateful jerks like them can do.


Heads up

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 09/18 at 08:24 AM (0) Comments

Just wanted to let you know in case you haven’t visited since earlier this week that I posted five pieces last night after being away from the computer all day. After an intro (“Sorry I’m late ...“), the posts include “Encyclopedia of Alabama,“ “Obama and campaign finance,“ “Meet ‘biennial limit,‘“ “European press on campaign finance” and “Analogy time.“

Find them by clicking on Sept. 17 in the sidebar calendar!


Page 1 of 1 pages

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles