Driving dummies

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 06/26 at 09:01 AM (0) Comments

Driving is a big responsibility. When you get behind the wheel, you have to do it with a clear understanding that you are taking your life, and the lives of others on the road and along the sidewalks, in your hands.

A little intelligence—like, enough sense to get in out of the rain—doesn’t hurt when it comes to driving safely.

That’s why it’s scary to think that there are people like this out there:

A 24-year-old woman who was clocked speeding by Loop 101 photo enforcement cameras 22 times in less than two months was arrested and placed in jail.

Jennifer Bitton, of Las Vegas, described by authorities as a “habitual speeder,“ was arrested by Department of Public Safety officers at her parents’ home in north Scottsdale on Friday and booked into the Scottsdale City Jail on suspicion of two counts of criminal speeding, reckless driving and one count of endangerment, DPS announced Tuesday.

Bitton told officers she “didn’t know cameras were there.“ She was flashed 22 times in a 45-day period beginning in mid-May. The fastest speed she was clocked at in her Ford Mustang was 92 mph, according to the agency.

Unfortunately, Britton’s not alone in her idiocy:

From March 2, 2006, to July 31, 2006, Francesca Cisneros of Chandler, then 32, threw away more than 70 speeding notifications she received on Loop 101 in Scottsdale in her Honda Civic. At the time of her arrest, she told police she said she didn’t think anything would happen to her if she threw away the tickets.

What a couple of morons.

Sounds like the local DMVs need to develop a new component to the driving test—like only giving them when it rains.


Christina Aguilera rocks the vote

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 06/25 at 11:11 PM (1) Comments

Christina Aguilera was a guest on Larry King Live tonight, and she discussed her involvement in this year’s Rock the Vote initiative to increase voter participation among young Americans.

Aguilera shot a forthcoming public service announcement with her infant son, Max, wrapped in an American flag.

I’m not usually big on celebrities getting involved in politics. I have usually found that their mouths far outrun their knowledge on—well, on pretty much every issue on which they have anything to say.

But I was pleasantly surprised by Aguilera’s comments.

  • On why she is involved with Rock the Vote: “In particular, for me, being a new mother, you know, it was really important for me to get involved and get excited about this election in particular, being such one of change and new development for our country and for the future of my son. You know, being a new mother, I just want the best possibilities for him so I was extra excited about getting involved.“

  • Asked whether she had any qualms about “displaying” her baby boy in the commercial, Aguilera replied, “What a great way to sort of subject him in such a positive way and in such a great time in history to do something as positive as getting people to vote and getting people to care about their country and get excited about this change?“

  • On plans for her to sing “America the Beautiful” as part of the project: “It was really, really nice to bring it down to a really intimate moment between me and my son and kind of symbolizing what this song means in the sense that it’s passing it on to the next generation. It’s trying to contribute in a way to make the future better for my son.“

    Aguilera admits that, although she registered to vote “as soon as (she) could,“ it wasn’t until the last election that she actually did, a circumstance she calls “embarrasing.“

    You know, I sort of grew up—as I’m sure a lot of people out there probably do the same. A lot of people give up on politics. A lot of people are like, oh, there’s so much dishonesty, I just want to wash my hands of the whole thing.

    But I sort of grew up in a house where politics weren’t discussed. It wasn’t really something that was talked about, different issues, concerns. It was sort of a hopeless situation in my home. And as I grew up and became a woman myself, started caring about certain things such as domestic violence, being the background that I came from and whatnot, certain issues were brought up to me that I felt, you know, I can voice my opinion, I can change how the world is.

    You know, it takes one person. And then, you know, it goes from there. And so the last election was the one which I had done Declare Yourself, the campaign there with Norman Lear where I really made it a point to get out there and really encourage others to vote and really exercise—and as a woman, that’s embarrassing for me that it took me that long just because, you know, we weren’t always give than right and I think it’s really taken for granted, especially with the younger generation now, you know? So it’s something that I really, really am adamant about getting out there.

    Aguilera said she believes young people who don’t vote aren’t “seeing the bigger picture.

    “I think when you’re young, you have the sense, too, that you’re sort of invincible and—or that you’re not taken seriously, and that it will matter later on, later on down, down the road maybe.

    “But, really, you know, time goes quickly. I’m 27 years old, but already, you know, being a mother and ... things happen,“ she said. “And it’s so important to get involved. And I think now more than ever actually I think young people are really getting involved. I think with the Internet boom over the years and everything being so accessible at the press of a button at your fingertips, I think, you know, anything is available to you as far as information and whatnot. So I think it’s—now more than ever it’s a great time to get involved.“

    Aguilera called this presidential campaign “a ground-breaking time in history. I mean, we had a woman running for president, which was pretty much unheard of. An African-American running for president. So it’s just exciting, the change that has come to our country and just to get involved and—and I think, also, that’s another reason why young people might be more motivated now to vote, just because they can see, you know, what might have been even unheard of or unthinkable even last election, it’s right here and right now and very present and this is the moment. This is the moment.“

    The original Rock the Vote campaign, which featured Madonna in a spinoff of her hit “Vogue” in 1992, led to the registrations of “hundreds of thousands of young people” and “a huge increase in young voter turnout that year,“ according to the campaign’s director, Heather Smith. This year’s campaign seeks to register two million young voters—a drive Smith said would be the “largest youth voter registration campaign in history by about three-and-a-half times”—in anticipation of the 2008 general election, which she says she expects to draw “the largest increase of young voters at the polls in our nation’s history.“

    An interesting aside: Smith noted that, in a great twist of irony, John McCain and Barack Obama each won Rock the Vote’s awards in 2005 for doing “great young voter outreach.“

    The 44 million young people in America comprise one-fifth of this country’s voting population.

    Let the games begin!


  • Bradley Byrne for governor?

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 06/25 at 11:57 AM (0) Comments

    Maybe, according to his comments in an interview with Helen over in Doc’s Political Parlor.

    Ever since he left the State Senate last year to replace disgraced former State Board of Education chancellor Roy Johnson, there’s been talk about the potential Byrne had to mine the corruption issue for political gold.

    One year into his term at the helm of the SBOE, Byrne has forged a reputation as a corruption-fighting crusader—and impressed many an editorial board in the process.

    It’s an interesting and wide-ranging interview. The high points:

  • Byrne says he considers the early jockeying for position among potential gubernatorial candidates, which is already going on, to be “way premature.“ He says he hasn’t made a decision whether to run for governor; in fact, he says, “Frankly, I haven’t thought that much about it ... I just don’t have time to deal with it.“ Byrne adds that he won’t be pressured by other factors or potential rivals into making a decision before he’s ready; “I’m just going to move on what I think is the appropriate schedule for me and not on what other people think ought to be the schedule for me ... I am just not going to let myself be sucked into that.“

  • When it comes time to decide, Byrne says the number one factor influencing his choice will be his family: “If it really didn’t work for the family, then we wouldn’t do it. That’s a no-brainer.“ Following on the heels of that consideration will be a sober look at his electability. “I don’t believe in going off on a fool’s errand. Just because people come up to me from time-to-time and say, ‘I wish you’d run for governor,’ doesn’t mean that I’m necessarily electable ... What may seem like the right thing to do today may not be the right thing to do two years from now or a year from now,“ he says.

  • Byrne expects that the Democratic nominee for governor will be U.S. Rep. Artur Davis. Davis, Byrne says, is “a very smart, articulate guy and will run a very effective campaign,“ Byrne says, adding that Davis “would be very hard to beat in a Democratic primary.“

  • Byrne doesn’t intend to follow political ambition out of Alabama, “even to become a United States senator,“ Helen writes. “It doesn’t interest me AT ALL,“ Byrne says.

    And although Byrne hasn’t engaged in decision-making processes yet, perhaps we can gain a window into his thinking from this statement:

    “And I think there’s so many important things for us to be doing here in Alabama in state government, I really do. We have good people that represent us in Washington. We’ve got good senators and good congressmen, we’ve got some retirements coming here that I know are going to be a loss for the state, but I just don’t feel like it’s a great need for our state.”

    “But I do think there’s a great need in our state for strong leaders on the state level. I think that’s been a problem that’s plagued us for a long time. And now that we’ve seen a true, new South, progressive governor in Governor Riley, we all understand we want to keep that. We want to keep going in that direction. If I’m going to do anything, it will be in that area, it will not be in trying to go to Washington.”

    A guy like Byrne isn’t going to go where he feels he isn’t needed. But will he go where he believes there is a need?

    Finally, in my opinion, the most refreshing thing Byrne said was this:

    “I’ve probably learned, even more than I already knew, just how imperfect I am ... I knew I was imperfect before I started, but when you get into a process like this you have a lot of people who are paying very close attention to what you’re doing and providing criticism along the way. Sometimes they’re right. And it would be very tempting for me to say all the criticism leveled at me is wrong, but I think there have been sometimes that people have said some things that were negative about my performance where I had to stop and listen and learn.”

    Wow.

    Bradley Byrne is a pragmatic, bottom-line kind of guy. It seems to me that he is concerned more with what makes common sense than with what fits the party line. Maybe I’m wrong. But it’s hard to find partisan fault with a guy whose critics are almost exclusively Democrats but whose praises are being sung by most of the editorial boards throughout the state.

    Byrne says he considers Davis the Democrats’ presumptive gubernatorial nominee.

    I say Byrne is Davis’ presumptive gubernatorial opponent.

    Read Helen’s narrative of the interview, along with reader comments, here. Note that Helen will have more coming from her interview with Byrne, including his take on taxes and the Alabama Legislature.


  • Dobson attacks Obama

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 06/24 at 11:46 PM (0) Comments

    Just when you thought James Dobson was giving up his meddling in power-play politics for a return to true ministry, he swoops down to snatch his tattered reputation out of rehab.

    This time, he surfaced for air long enough to go after Democratic presidential nominee-in-waiting Barack Obama.

    CNN reports that Dobson “is accusing Sen. Barack Obama of deliberately distorting the Bible and taking a ‘fruitcake interpretation’ of the U.S. Constitution.“

    You’ve gotta hand it to ol’ Jim. He’s nothing if not eloquent. “Fruitcake.“ Is there an Aramaic equivalent to that?

    Dobson lambasted a 2006 speech—

    SIDEBAR: Let’s stop there for a minute. A 2006 speech. Think about that for a minute. These remarks have been around since 2006, and apparently they were SO OFFENSIVE to James Dobson that it took him a year and a half, at least, to gather up all his righteous indignation. A year and a half. END SIDEBAR

    —a 2006 speech wherein Obama suggested, according to CNN, “that it would be impractical to govern based solely on the word of the Bible.“

    Obama noted a couple of passages from the Old Testament books known as the Pentateuch, or Books of the Law, to illustrate his point.

    Dobson charged that Obama is “deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own world view, his own confused theology” and that Obama is “dragging biblical understanding through the gutter.“ (Read and hear more at the Focus on the Family-related

    527

    I mean, web site here and here.)

    Dobson was apparently too blinded by rage to realize it, but he was proving Obama’s point: Governing “solely” on the basis of the Bible would be impossible, because the New Testament, the sacred Scriptures that primarily guide Christianity, sometimes conflicts with the Old Testament, the sacred Scriptures that primarily guide Judaism. Such was the impact of Jesus’ life on Earth.

    This is not to say that some religious precepts can’t, or shouldn’t, be pursued in public policy. On the contrary, Obama’s speech was basically a road map of how he believes the “religiously motivated” could find more success in government:

    “Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal rather than religion-specific values,“ Obama said in the 2006 speech. “It requires their proposals be subject to argument and amenable to reason.“

    Oh, you could almost see the bulging blood vessel in Dobson’s forehead. According to CNN:

    Dobson said the suggestion is an attempt to lead by the “lowest common denominator of morality.“

    “Am I required in a democracy to conform my efforts in the political arena to his bloody notion of what is right with regard to the lives of tiny babies?“ he asked. “What he’s trying to say here is, unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe.

    “What the senator is saying there, in essence, is that ‘I can’t seek to pass legislation, for example, that bans partial-birth abortion, because there are people in the culture who don’t see that as a moral issue,‘ “ Dobson said. “And if I can’t get everyone to agree with me, than it is undemocratic to try to pass legislation that I find offensive to the Scripture. Now, that is a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution.“

    Um, no.

    Is there anything in Obama’s statement that indicates that he believes that people of faith have no right to fight for what they believe in “unless everybody agrees?“

    No.

    Is there anything in Obama’s statement that indicates that he believes people of faith must “conform” to the moral beliefs of those with whom they disagree?

    No!

    Talk about your “fruitcake interpretations.“ Dobson just doesn’t get it.

    What Obama is saying is that, understanding that the lawmakers of this country are 536 (including the president) different people with different religions, different teachings and different interpretations of those teachings, people of faith can do themselves a favor by couching their arguments in “universal values” that are “subject to argument.“ By doing this, they actually strengthen their positions that would otherwise stand only on subjective religious beliefs.

    And is that anything more, or less, than what the Founders intended for any other issue being deliberated by Congress?

    No! Nor should it be!

    I’m no fan of James Dobson and other evangelical political wanna-bes like him. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not saying Christians have less of a right to assembly, petition and advocacy than others. Actually, I’ve been on the forefront of many of those issues throughout my career in government. But the reason I find the Dobson Doctrine, if you will, so distasteful is that it is so counterproductive to achieving the goals and accomplishing the changes its followers supposedly want so badly to affect. By cleaving so unswervingly to their dogma to the exclusion of even the mere idea that they might consider another viewpoint, all Dobson’s followers do by holding their hands over their ears is alienate others who might otherwise be able to be convinced of their positions.

    I have written about this before. Here is my main post about why evangelicals who moonlight as politicians are so disgusting (read this one if you only have time for one), here is the column I wrote about the disturbing battle for evangelical endorsements last fall and here are my Dobson-related posts (warning: they’re not pretty).

    One more note: James Dobson has also made clear his disdain for GOP nominee-in-waiting John McCain. He said earlier this year that if McCain and Obama are the nominees, he “simply will not cast a ballot for president for the first time in my life.“

    You might say that Dobson has washed his hands of the presidential race.


    ‘Poverty forces parents to give up kids’

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 06/24 at 10:28 PM (0) Comments

    Forget choosing between groceries and prescriptions. How about having to choose between rent and your firstborn son?

    It’s happening in Indonesia. See the heartwrenching proof here.

    Dear God. Is this what we’ve come to?


    Page 203 of 235 pages « First  <  201 202 203 204 205 >  Last »

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles