ALGOP releases first web video of 2010 cycle

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 11/03 at 03:57 PM (0) Comments

From the Alabama Republican Party today:

The Alabama Republican Party has released their first web video of the 2010 campaign. The video highlights the ethical struggle that Alabama Democrat officials have had, and their unwillingness to do anything about cleaning up the culture of corruption in Alabama – You may view video by clicking either of the links below:

http://www.algop.org/node/416

or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaurRu7sb-M

This release previews the GOP’s media-based strategy for 2010. Look for the party to make significant use of video, social media and other Web-based tools to spread their message that Democrats have controlled the Alabama Legislature long enough.


Tuesday: Political junkies’ delight

By Jennifer J. Foster

Posted 11/03 at 06:13 AM (2) Comments

Today is a big day for political junkies—especially in Alabama.

All sorts of intrigue awaits later today as several contentious races will be settled:

  • In the New Jersey governor’s race, incumbent Jon “Don’t vote for the fat guy” Corzine finally faces off with Republican challenger Chris Christie. You might remember a recent post I wrote about the whole “fat” thing. This race seems to be in a dead heat, so the results will be eagerly awaited.

  • Virginia looks poised to elect a Republican governor to succeed super-popular Democratic Gov. Tim “should-have-been-VP” Kaine despite President Obama’s support for the Democratic candidate, R. Creigh Deeds. Polls show that some dissatisfaction with the Obama/Pelosi/Democratic legislative platform has been a component in GOP candidate Bob McDonnell’s healthy preview numbers, and pundits will chatter tomorrow night about what this race means, if anything, for congressional Democrats in 2010.

  • The congressional race in New York’s 23rd District, one of the most bizarre contests ever, will be settled between a candidate on the Conservative Party platform and a Democrat (who was endorsed by the Republican nominee, who dropped out this weekend). Yes, I said it was strange. Read more here. But the takeaway in this contest won’t be the winner; it will be how grassroots Republicans and conservative (small c) independents break with mainline Republicans. When the pundits get sick of talking about New Jersey, they’ll talk this one up (or, if you watch MSNBC, they’ll focus on it completely to play up the splits in the GOP).

  • And then there are the ballot measures, always fun. Issues this year include medical marijuana expansion (Maine), the repeal of benefits extention to gay couples (Washington), the repeal of a statute allowing gay marriage (Maine) and whether to allow casino gambling for economic benefit (Ohio). Fun, huh?

  • OH!! And I almost forgot. If all those elections and ballot initiatives weren’t enough fun, CNN is going to have JESSE VENTURA on as a guest on Larry King Live! Yes, the former-wrestler-turned-governor-of-Minnesota-turned-party-unaffiliate will be sounding off about the evils of organized politics tomorrow night. CNN! What? Joy Behar wasn’t available? Oh, that’s right—you guys gave her her own show. And how’s that working out, exactly?

    Closer to home, there’s plenty going on, too:

  • The Alabama Republican Party will host a news conference in Montgomery at 10 a.m. to talk ethics reform. Word has it that there are some questions about some personnel spending in the Senate, among a bunch of other related things.

  • GOP gubernatorial candidate Bradley Byrne will roll out his ethics plan at 2 p.m. in Birmingham. “Byrne will outline the specifics of his Ethics Reform package and his plans for achieving legislative passage,“ according to a campaign news release. Note the capital E and the capital R. It must be important if random, inexplicable capitalization is involved!

  • Unless he’s planning a first-hand report about rush-hour traffic on 280, Byrne had better make it quick in Birmingham, or rent a helicopter, because he’s due to appear with the other six announced gubernatorial candidates in a forum at Auburn University at 7 p.m. This is one of the first times all seven candidates—two Democrats, five Republicans—will appear together. Yes, I’m planning to be there, if for no other reason than to report to you how many times the candidates dodge state issues, like why most of them don’t trust you to reform Alabama’s antiquated constitution, to share with you their unsolicited thoughts on congressional issues, like how much they oppose the dreaded OBAMACARE (insert blood-curdling screams from your Halloween garden noise machine here).

    I’m really counting on the League of Women Voters and our local chambers of commerce to keep the candidates’ feet to the fire and keep their attention focused where it should be—on the people, potential and problems in Alabama, not on cheap shots at national figures in Washington.


  • FactCheck on abortion funding in health care debate

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 11/02 at 03:47 PM (0) Comments

    President Obama and pro-choice Democrats insist one thing.

    Pro-life Democrats and right-to-life groups insist the exact opposite.

    Confused about who’s telling the truth in the debate over taxpayer-funded abortions in the health care bill?

    You’re not alone.

    I’ve been telling you for weeks now that the bill would provide abortion coverage under a taxpayer-funded public option.

    But don’t take my word for it. Read what FactCheck.org has to say.

    As usual, FactCheck does a great job of cutting through the bull to the bottom line.

    And the bottom line is more irrefutable than most, in this time of squishy-mouthed, double-talking politicians.


    ‘Not happy with me’

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 11/02 at 02:09 PM (0) Comments

    I told you last week about how U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak, a pro-life Democrat, has organized a group of Democrats to vote with Republicans to block the health care legislation if it is not amended to block taxpayer money from being used to cover abortion. (Details, including an explanation of how the current bill would change standing federal policy on tax-funded abortions, in last week’s post.)

    Let’s see how Speaker Nancy Pelosi is doing with this big-tent concept, shall we?

    From The Hill:

    Rep. Bart Stupak said Speaker Pelosi is not pleased with his effort to change abortion-related provisions in the healthcare bill being crafted by the House.

    During an interview on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” show, Stupak (D-Mich.) said he is undeterred in trying to ensure that taxpayer dollars do not pay for abortions. Stupak, who opposes abortion rights, acknowledged that some in his party are upset with his public campaign to change the bill ...

    Stupak pointed out that he and Democratic leaders have a fundamental disagreement on whether health plans that receive subsidies from the government should be allowed to provide coverage options on abortions.

    Stupak wants a vote on the House floor to strike the language, and predicts he would have the votes to pass such an amendment.

    “This has been federal law since 1976,“ he said, noting that President Barack Obama has vowed not to allow healthcare reform to pay for abortions.

    “We have to have a vote,“ he said.

    Hmm. Sounds like Pelosi isn’t playing well with others.

    Well, no worries. This guy is just like so many others, right? He’ll make a lot of noise for the national media attention, and then he’ll back down in time for things to calm down so he can keep his seat.

    Not so fast, my friend.

    Stupak stressed he wants to vote for healthcare reform and is “still somewhat optimistic” that he will reach an accord with Democratic leaders.

    However, the Michigan Democrat said he will not be backing down: “I’m comfortable with where I’m at. This is who I am. It’s reflective of my district. If it costs me my seat, so be it.“

    Wow. A principle-driven legislator, completely unafraid of losing his power—and, therefore, uncontrollable?

    No wonder Pelosi doesn’t dig him.

    See also:

  • Remember how we were talking about how, if left unaddressed, this component of the health care legislation could create problems for the Democratic leadership and the bill’s overall prospects? Behold, pushback: CNN’s Political Ticker had this item last week on how the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops urged priests around the country to speak out against the legislation from the pulpit this Sunday. The conference provided fliers for insertion into this weekend’s newsletters “urging parishioners to contact their senators and representatives to ask them ‘to fix these bills with the pro-life amendments,‘“ CNN reported.

    “The bills will have to change or the bishops have pledged to oppose them,“ the flier reads. “Our nation is at a crossroads.“

    Indeed.

  • Check out this story about a former executive director of a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Texas who had a change of heart after witnessing a shift in the organization’s focus:

    According to (former director Abby) Johnson, the non-profit was struggling under the weight of a tough economy, and changing it’s business model from one that pushed prevention, to one that focused on abortion.

    “It seemed like maybe that’s not what a lot of people were believing any more because that’s not where the money was. The money wasn’t in family planning, the money wasn’t in prevention, the money was in abortion and so I had a problem with that,“ said Johnson.

    Johnson said she was told to bring in more women who wanted abortions, something the Episcopalian church goer recently became convicted about.

    I have said here before that it never made any sense to me to put an organization with a financial stake in the failure of contraception in charge of teaching contraception.

    Abby Johnson’s comments illustrate the point.


  • This week’s column

    By Jennifer J. Foster

    Posted 11/02 at 11:23 AM (0) Comments

    In case you missed it in Saturday’s Opelika-Auburn News, or if you live outside the print delivery area, this week’s column is now available online. Check it out:

    Political e-mail: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

    As you can probably surmise from the title, it’s all about the perils—and promise, if you look hard enough—of electronic electioneering.

    Let me know what you think.


    Page 4 of 235 pages « First  <  2 3 4 5 6 >  Last »

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles