Jones faces possible death sentence
Vasha Hunt | Opelika-Auburn News
Barry Lee Jones was convicted of capital murder Friday.
staff writer
Published: November 20, 2009
It took two days to pick the jury that would hear the capital murder case against the Opelika man accused of killing his infant son nearly two years ago.
It took the state of Alabama nearly two days for all its witnesses to testify.
It took a 12-member jury an hour Friday afternoon to find Barry Lee Jones, 20, guilty of capital murder in the death of his 7-month-old son, Kevin Christopher Jones.
Circuit Court Judge Jacob A. Walker III asked Jones and those in the courtroom, which included members of Jones’ family, not to display emotion when the verdict was read. They obliged.
The jury will return to the courtroom at 9 a.m. Monday to begin the sentencing phase. It will decide whether Jones should be given life in prison without parole or the death penalty.
Jones was charged with capital murder, sexual assault, sodomy and rape in connection with Kevin’s death, and injury to a 3-year-old non-relative girl on Dec. 11, 2007. However, this trial focused only on the capital murder charge.
Jones did not testify, but in an earlier affidavit, he claimed that he had been hit on the head by an an unknown person and that when he regained consciousness the children were injured.
He showed no emotion during the week-long trial, sitting between his lawyers, speaking only to them and, on occasion, to family members, who sat behind him all week.
But he broke his silence Friday morning, when he and his lawyers appeared before Walker to discuss the possibility of him testifying.
Walker told Jones he was not required to testify.
“Is it your decision to testify?” Walker asked.
“Yes, it is, sir,” responded Jones.
Jones left the courtroom to discuss the issue with his mother. When they returned, he told the judge he had changed his mind. The defense rested immediately afterward.
Earlier Friday, the defense called one of its two witnesses, Barbara Mitchell, who lives on Toomers Court in Opelika, where Jones, his wife and two children lived. She recalled seeing two men standing outside a home across the street when she was hanging her laundry between 8 and 9 a.m. Dec. 11.
“There were two black boys standing on the side of the house,” Mitchell said. “That’s all I know. I don’t know their names or nothing.”
The state had no rebuttal witnesses to Mitchell or the other defense witness, Opelika police Cpl. Jason Dunson, who testified Thursday about a security video taken from a local convenience store.
The jury of seven white men and five women — two of them black — began deliberations about 3 p.m. Friday after hearing closing arguments from the opposing attorneys.
During his closing argument, Lee County assistant district attorney Kenny Gibbs recounted the injuries that caused Kevin’s death.
Gibbs said Kevin was used as a “bludgeoning instrument” to hit the young girl, which caused the boy’s death and left her with life-threatening injuries.
Dr. Stephen Boudreaux with the Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences testified Wednesday that Kevin suffered at least two “significant blows,” one each to the chest and abdomen that tore his liver, damaged surrounding tissue, and fractured multiple ribs. The cause of Kevin’s death was blunt force trauma, Gibbs said.
When Gibbs showed pictures of the baby boy’s body, covered with bruises, one female juror began to cry.
Todd Crutchfield, the court-appointed defense attorney, noted the testimony of the multi-care technician at East Alabama Medical Center, who said Jones was “distressed” when he came in with Kevin that morning.
Crutchfield also downplayed DNA testing on Jones’ stain-covered quilt.
He said the Opelika Police Department didn’t follow up on Mitchell’s claim of seeing two men near the home. He claimed “they got their man,” so there was no need to investigate any further.
William Whatley, a veteran defense attorney out of Montgomery, called Kevin’s death a “horrible, terrible crime,” but said the state’s claim that Jones was responsible didn’t add up. He questioned how a 20-pound, 7-month-old child could be used to inflict injury, and why the quilt wasn’t soaked with blood.
“We are here about blunt force trauma and the death of Kevin,” he said. “The other stuff is just to keep you so inflamed and aggravated that you want to convict him.”
Whatley said Jones still maintains his innocence, as he has all along, and he urged the jury to find him not guilty.
In his rebuttal, chief trial assistant district attorney Robbie Treese urged the jury to use common sense.
If Jones still contends that he was hit so hard in the head, he was knocked unconscious and another person hurt the children, Treese said his head would have been “a bloody mess.” The two doctors who examined him on Dec. 11 and found no signs of trauma on Jones’ head didn’t lie and wouldn’t perjury themselves, he said.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
WHEN I SAY THANK GOD,FOR SPEAKING AND TAKING CARE OF THE EVIL THAT CONTINUES TO KILL HIS CHILDREN.NOTICE ALL THESE CASES ARE GOING TO TRIAL ON ALL THE CHILDREN THAT ARE BEING MURDERED.
I FIND THIS SO DISHEARTNING THAT WE AS A SOCIETY FIND THIS RACIAL,WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A CHRISTOPHER AND THE OTHER VICTIM.
CHILDREN THAT CANNOT DEFEND THEMSELVES.THANK THE VERY PERSON THAT PUT THEM ON THIS CRUEL EARTH IS SPEAKING FOR THEM THANK GOD HE IS TAKING CARE OF THESE CHILDREN THAT CONTINUE TO BE MURDERED BY THE HANDS OF PARENTS ,SIBLINGS,STRANGERS.GOD IS NOT STANDING FOR THIS HE IS TAKING CONTROL MAKING SURE THEIR VOICES ARE BEING HEARD
BEYOND THE GRAVE.I DO NOT ADVOCATE DEATH,THEIR IS SPECIAL PLACES FOR PEOPLE
THAT KILL.CHRISTOPHER WILL BE FOREVER IN OUR HEARTS,CLOSE THE CHAPTER AND LET JUSTICE BE SERVED.
Juries in capital cases do not employ juror nullification which you may see in a drug case or sex case. At least they usually don’t…at least in this part of the country.
Jury selection is an important part of the process. Each side is looking for a particular juror. In a capital case, you have the additional factor of expressing your opinion concerning the “death penalty” since if a conviction is determined the only two options are death or Life Without Parole (under current statutes LWOP is LWOP). If a juror says in all cases they would put a murderer to death, they don’t qualify under case law. If a juror says they cannot put a person to death under any circumstances, they don’t qualify under case law. They have to be willing to consider the facts and apply it to the law as it exists in Alabama and not make arbitrary decisions contrary to their oath. Pretty simple. You can or can’t follow the law.
The second thing that is going on in a criminal case is that the State and Defense have contrary interests as to who should serve on a jury. The State is interested in “good citizens”. The Defense is looking for people more likely to acquit. The State will strike people that have criminal records and express opinions contrary to law…like “I cannot convict without being convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt”. The legal standard is “beyond a reasonable doubt”, which is a lesser standard. Beyond “all” doubt is very often a legal impossibility and opens the door for nullification.
Often the jury that is left to sit are persons that are regular people that reflect the views and thoughts of the community in general.
The major premis is that “Juries want to do the right thing”.
When making a recommendation for death in a capital murder, 10 of the 12 jurors must agree. At least 7 must agree on LWOP. It is possible to “hang” a sentencing jury and have to select another jury just for that purpose.
It is one thing to say a person is evil and deserves death and another to be a part of the group, with full awareness of the facts, to make that decision. Mitigation specialists are routinely employed to present evidence in the sentencing phase to point to some redeeming value of the defendant.
Capital cases employ the application of mitigating and aggravating circumstances for the jury to weigh. One of the most common aggravators is whether the crime was particularly heinous, atrocious and cruel. Capital murder itself is an aggravated offense. They differ from other murders by being “intentional murder” with some other factor like during a rape, during a kidnapping, more than one killed, a law enforcement officer of politician, etc. Once the crime is raised to capital, then the jury must decide whether compared to other crimes of a similar nature (in this case a child was killed), does it raise to the level of a death penalty recommendation. Not that it was bad and evil like all murder, but were the circumstances so different to warrant death.
Each juror and jury weighs all of it and conscienciously arrives at a decision as to where they feel the appropriate sentence falls. Each jury will be different in the final vote, but generally speaking, most juries will make the same recommendation.
That is not to say a sentence of death or LWOP is correct. The American system of justice says, that is a decision of the citizens charged with the recommendation.
This boy and the mother are pure evil. I don’t care if the jury was all green. Idiots need to stay out of trouble. People need to stop blaming others for their actions.
Kwon! Seriously have you ever been through the process of selecting a jury??? You are eliminated by one hundreds of questions! Not your color!! Give me a break and get over this racial crap!!! It is the State against Barry Jones. I believe the attorney for the state is Mr. Kenny Gibbs who happens to be black man and Mr. William Whatley, Jones’ attorney, happens to be a white man!!! Really?
My bad. I didn’t see anything about her in the above article. We’ll never know what really happened.
flyonwall, I’m not certain what your statement meant “the mother?,“ but most definitely she deserves the book thrown at her:
“Moore, 25, faces charges of willful abuse of a child and failure to report child abuse related to the December 2007 incident.“ OA News Nov 19, 2009
She knew, she may have even participated per the charge, and yet she did nothing to protect these precious angels. Tears for her dead infant son and badly beaten daughter two years after the fact, do nothing to protect them. She obviously did nothing to protect them then. She is a sorry excuse for a mother and should go directly to jail for the rest of her life.
To those saying that divine justice will be served in this case, I am of the opinion that we hasten that meeting.
The mother?
Wait a minute people, the man raped his infant son then used his little body to beat his step daughter, so severely that she required extended hospitalization. This is not black or white, this is the ultimate evil. Send him to the chair and rid the world of this complete embodiment of evil. The world is a better place without this type of complete filth, and the mother. Send her away forever too. She failed to protect her sweet little angels. She deserves to never see the light of day again and sit in a cell to think about her failure as a mother to protect her babies.





Advertisement