Mike Hubbard: AEA’s response display of political misdirection

» 7 Comments | Post a Comment

When a Republican gubernatorial candidate recently questioned several actions, goals and initiatives of the Alabama Education Association, the group’s leadership hollered loudly and cried foul. I, personally, believe the response was an elaborate display of political misdirection in which the group flailed its right arm wildly in order to avert attention from what its left arm was doing.

The AEA has used the tactic quite successfully time and time again in the past, but the question of how much longer it will work remains.

AEA Executive Secretary Paul Hubbert and his second-in-command, Joe Reed, claim the group is nothing more than a “professional development association” dedicated to the improvement of education for children and teachers alike. Because the group includes the word “Education” in its name, some members of the public tacitly accept this claim.

In reality, AEA operates as a very politically active labor union dedicated solely to amassing lucrative employment benefits for its members and the election of Democratic candidates throughout state government. Its two leaders, Hubbert and Reed, serve as vice-chairs of the Alabama Democratic Party, and the list of candidates receiving contributions from the association’s political action committee reads like a who’s who of Alabama’s left-leaning politicos and public officials.

Let me be clear that any criticism being levied is not aimed at the public school teachers, administrators and other support personnel who work every day to provide our children with a quality education. I, and the Alabama Republican Party, deeply appreciate their efforts and sacrifice.

My critiques lie, instead, with the AEA leadership, who routinely block any and all efforts to institute reforms in our public education system, including those that would improve the lives and working conditions of the teachers who belong to and pay dues to the group.

As an example, I introduced a bill called the Teacher Protection Act, which would require the state to provide each public school instructor with free liability insurance in order to shield them from lawsuits filed as a result of carrying out their job duties. Providing teachers with this insurance would relieve them of both financial strain and the worry that comes with doing their jobs in a litigious era.

Sounds like a bill that AEA would easily support, right? Wrong.

Many new AEA members, mostly rookie teachers in their first year, are recruited by bullying union reps who frighten them with tales of classroom lawsuits and administrative reviews. Teachers’ only hope of survival, they say, is joining the AEA and taking part in the liability insurance it provides in return for several hundred dollars in yearly union dues.

Allowing the state to provide free insurance would remove one of the union’s biggest selling points and most successful recruiting tactics, so, of course, Hubbert and his team killed the bill – a move that was good for the union bosses but bad for public school teachers.

Performance-based pay is another idea that has been consistently proposed by education reformers and consistently opposed by AEA. Under one suggested plan, teachers who consistently excel and apply themselves would be paid bonuses based upon their reviews and successes, a form of incentive that has worked very well in the private sector world. Despite the fact that many teachers would benefit from such a fair and reasonable bonus plan, AEA, in a fit of twisted logic, believes that rewarding good teachers is somehow inherently unfair to bad teachers. Thus, all teachers lose.

From their choices for chancellor to the implementation of ethics requirements, AEA has consistently opposed most of the efforts by Gov. Riley and the State Board of Education to clean up the waste, mismanagement and corruption in the two-year college system. The group has also battled ferociously to protect double-dipping legislators who draw two state paychecks despite the many ethical questions and conflicts of interest the situation raises.

Tax cuts, charter schools, tenure reform and dozens of other issues are additional examples of much needed, common sense proposals killed time and time again by the group.

As long as the AEA continues to operate as a partisan political labor union working to put its own interests before the best interests of the state and our school children, it will continue to draw criticism from Republicans and those on the conservative end of the spectrum.

Rep. Mike Hubbard (R-Auburn) represents District 79 in the Alabama House of Representatives and is the House Minority Leader. He also serves as Chairman of the Alabama Republican Party.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Captain Plaid on October 31, 2009 at 6:06 pm

Good Citizen, Nobody testified for “no work” jobs, as surely they are wrong, although we had several pols that seemingly didn’t get that memo it appears, but rather questioned painting with such as broad brush. Why should educators be unable to serve in the Legislature, which is still a part-time job for most folks, when other professions are able to hold these positions?

Flag Comment Posted by pd3310 on October 31, 2009 at 4:51 pm

Good Citizen: You’re right, I did miss that.  So then, Paul Hubbert is just as unethical as Mike Hubbard?....a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black then??  Perhaps, but the difference here is that at least Hubbert is doing whatever he can (ethical or not) for the benefit of his constituency, whereas Mike Hubbard is doing whatever he can (ethical or not) for the benefit of Mike Hubbard… always has, always will.  Oh, one more difference….Hubbert works for the AEA, while Mike Hubbard is SUPPOSED to work for the taxpayers.  HUGE difference there in my book.

Flag Comment Posted by Good Citizen on October 31, 2009 at 4:24 pm

Perhaps you missed the testimony last year where Paul Hubbert and the Speaker of the House Seth Hammet got no work jobs for legislators.  The evidence was clear and convincing they they were paying off members of the legislature for their loyalty.  Paul Hubbert is standing opposed to ethics reform and to any educational program that doesn’t put money into the hand of education employees.  He has been trying to gut the Alabama Reading initiative since its inception.

The sooner the AEA’s death grip on the Alabama Legislature the better off we will al be.  That includes our schools.

Flag Comment Posted by pd3310 on October 31, 2009 at 5:43 am

Once again, Mike Hubbard’s unenlightened view of the issues is blinded by his conservative agenda, close-mindedness,  and limited ability to see past anything except putting money in his own pocket.  When we he ever remove his head from his backside?  My guess is never.  I’m sure that’s all we expect from yet another ethically-challenged politician.

Flag Comment Posted by Captain Plaid on October 31, 2009 at 5:02 am

For Representative and Chairman Hubbard to complain of AEA’s “political misdirection” while he’s claiming various “common sense proposals” are being “killed ... by this group” seems rather ironic.  Project much Sir? 

Just how might “tax cuts” benefit education Representative and Chairman Hubbard?  I can understand how tax reform could yet truly how do “cuts” help those laboring in our classrooms?

Further, how might this “performance pay” be calculated?  Is it merely how students perform on standardized tests measuring a limited spectrum of what a teacher does?  Or is it tied to how an administrator, with perhaps their own agenda, evaluates an educator?  Just who is guilty of “twisted logic” Sir?

Certainly AEA could make improvements and yet they are generally sophisticated enough to rightly see through obvious efforts to do an end run around not only their own efforts but also conditions which would hinder effective classroom service.

To be a professional educator in this state where so much is controlled by the Big Mules is a challenge.  For teachers (and state employees) to try to go it alone would often be a foolish choice.

The attitude of the state GOP, with you writing as Chairman, toward AEA is clear enough.  Many teachers and citizens can accept the political realities in Alabama creating oppositional interests but Mike Hubbard accusing AEA of acting in bad faith for everything they do seems frankly a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Representative and Chairman Hubbard wrote that “AEA will continue to draw criticism from Republicans and those on the conservative end of the spectrum” so it is nice to know where things stand.

Flag Comment Posted by BB62 on October 30, 2009 at 6:16 pm

The AEA should be sued as a RICO organization for racketeering. Professional development? Don’t make us laugh.

Get rid of tenure and that helps get rid of all the people who should have been fired years ago. And it also stops them from being moved up into administration where they can do some real damage.

And get rid of those useless school counselors, if nothing else. How many of you have had your kids get scheduling error after error by these bozos or have had them give the exact opposite scheduling advice the kids need for courses before college?

And heaven help you if you actually ever need them to send out a transcript or anything because it will take weeks to pull their thumbs out of their anus and actually do it.

Flag Comment Posted by lp95 on October 30, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Ok Gilbert

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

· Subscribe to the Newspaper

· Yahoo! Hot Jobs: Post a resume

· Buy photos that ran in the O-A News

· Classifieds: Place an ad online

Advertisement

IYP and SEO vendors: SEO by eLocalListing | Advertiser profiles